Diagnostic Imaging

Updated: January 2021

Repeat X-Rays

  • A rapid review assessed the clinical utility of before and after spine radiographic analysis for structural and functional evaluation. “Rapid literature reviews”(World Health Organization) are a more expedient and affordable means of providing an overview of relevant evidence as compared to a systematic review. After applying all criteria, 176 full text articles were screened and 23 appraised. There were no relevant studies that assessed the clinical utility of routine or repeat spinal radiographs in the absence of red flags. Due to the risks of ionizing radiation, and the lack of evidence for the radiographic evaluations, the authors recommended against the use of routine or repeat evaluation of the structure and function of the spine. FREE FULL TEXT

    The rest of this research summary including the annotated bibliography with links to every article is only available to Clinical Compass Evidence Center Subscribers

    If you are you a Clinical Compass Evidence Center Subscriber, please CLICK HERE TO LOGIN
    If you are not yet a Clinical Compass Evidence Center Subscriber, CLICK HERE to learn how to access all of our research summaries for a 100% tax deductible donation of as little as $5 per month.



A literature synthesis of Chiropractic Care as it relates to Diagnostic Imaging — an academically rigorous analysis of all the available scientific literature using internationally accepted tools to rate each article according to specific criteria indicating only what we can conclude with supportable, scientific evidence.